subject
History, 13.04.2021 04:40 bunbun2913

Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in Baker v. Carr (1962) ? * 2 points Because rural districts had fewer people, representation was unevenly distributed; thus, Baker was denied equal protection under the law. To ensure equal protection under the law, there should be an equal number of rural and urban districts in a state. There should be redistricting every ten years at the federal level, but the state can choose not to redistrict at the state and local levels. Congressional redistricting must involve traditionally excluded groups in the process or it violates the equal protection clause.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:00
Write a supreme court opinion that describes your decision for united states vs abel fields
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
What treatments did king henry the 8th get after the horse accident?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
What does the term “escalation” refer to?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
Moral principles is what ? a. appreciation b. tariff c. fiscal d. ethics
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which of the following statements accurately summarizes the reasoning for the decision in Baker v. C...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722361