History, 13.04.2021 01:20 khyyonsb

Agree or disagree (and support your comment) with the argument below: The Spanish arrived in the 15th-16th century, and with numbers hovering around
100-300 (each ship could carry 35-50 men and supplies) killed off and or conquered the
200,000 upwards of 700,000 (Note: the range is wide depending upon sources) Aztec
soldiers. They then began a genocide of the Aztec (and others), even though with
smaller numbers, using soldiers (Spanish) who had been taken from bars and prisons,
with no education and living in poverty (unable to own or buy any metals for armor)
were given 1 musket and a blade. The officers of the Spanish forces were probably
educated - at least until about 3rd grade, a few further than that. Most officers came
from a higher class and many were despised by the rank and file soldiers they
commanded.
The Spanish brought massive cannons that were not easily moved or maneuverable,
but with the 12-20 or so canon and the couple thousand men by that time, they
conquered the Aztec people.

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 21:40

In which part of the united states did women first begin to get the right to vote? o a. the south o b. eastern coastal towns o c. the west o d. northern industrial cities

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 07:00

Me! these questions are based on american people in the south essential questions: question 1: for what reasons will one group of people exploit another?focus questions: question 1: what influenced the development of the south more: geography, economy, or slavery?question 2: what were the economic, political and social arguments for and againsts slavery in the first half of the 19th century.

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 07:40

What are the vedas? a. regions ruled by a vedic king b. a group of female hindu saints c. a tribe native to north india d. a collection of ancient hindu scriptures e. the autobiography of a saint

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 08:30

A. identify the constitutional clause that is common to both mccutcheon v. federal election commission (2014) and citizens united v. federal election commission (2010). based on the constitutional clause identified in part a, explain why the facts of citizens united v. federal election commission (2010) led to a similar holding to the holding in mccutcheon v. federal election commission (2014). describe an action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in mccutcheon v. federal election commission could take to limit its impact.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Agree or disagree (and support your comment) with the argument below: The Spanish arrived in the 15...

Questions