Please help me 1. What are some reasons that the Court gave to demonstrate that separate is actually unequal? How would you evaluate the strength of this argument?

2. The Court based their opinion largely on “psychological knowledge” and not in a constitutional theory. Why do you think they did this?

hr2520 is the patient's act. there is required the secretary of health to summon a committee to develop a national strategic plan of prevention. this committee has forth provisions that make possible for the govern entities to acquire private health insurance services.

is easier to keep this hr2520 as federal, because that way the secretary of health has centralized power to deal with private insurance companies and the federas government has more ways and power to negotiate with them, than doing this process state by state in their specific terms.

i beleive that d is the right answer

is there a table of answers to choose from?