In 2001, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled to accept evidence in a trial that was obtained by recording a phone conversation without a warrant. Which of these is most directly affected by this ruling?
O protection against unreasonable search and seizure
O consent of the governed
Oright to trial by a jury of one's peers
suspension of the writ of habeas corpus

The answer is below.

Explanation:

Considering the scenario described in the question, the most directly affected by this ruling is "protection against unreasonable search and seizure"

This is because the approval of a Supreme Court to an issue of obtaining or recording a phone conversation without a warrant will directly affect the individual's protection against the unreasonable search of and seizure of things.

hi how are you doing today? if you ever need just tell me