Even though it was just play acting, prisoners and guards in the experiment took their new ascribed statuses to heart. Prisoners became submissive and guards became dominant and sadistic. Remember that guards and prisoners were selected at random. Do you think dividing students into statuses of "gifted", "honors", "AP", etc. at such an early age might have similar effects on the behavior of students? In other words if a student is labeled as "high" or "low" achieving do you think it could have an effect on the student's future behavior?

oil! is what i am assuming

in 1989, tiananmen square in beijing was the site of china’s main industries. china’s government headquarters. -pro-democracy demonstrations. (second choice)

the committees of correspondence were the american colonies’ means for maintaining communication lines in the years before the revolutionary war. in 1764, boston formed the earliest committee of correspondence to encourage opposition to britain’s stiffening of customs enforcement and prohibition of american paper money. the following year, new york formed a similar committee to keep the other colonies notified of its actions in resisting the stamp act. in 1773, the virginia house of burgesses proposed that each colonial legislature appoint a committee for intercolonial correspondence. the exchanges that followed built solidarity during the turbulent times and bring about the formation of the first continental congress in 1774.

a because the britsh thought the ameracans were trators so a