Match each landmark Supreme Court case with the correct ruling Marbury v. Madison
Plessy v. Ferguson
Brown v. Board of Education
Miranda v Arizona
Segregation is constitutional.
An accused person's Fifth Amendment rights must be protected.
Segregation is unconstitutional.
The US government must function within the rule of law as established in
the Constitution

Miranda vs. Arizona - 5th amendment

Brown vs. Board of Education - Segregation was unconstitutional.

Marbury vs. Madison - U.S. Government must function...

Plessy vs. Ferguson - Segregation is constitutional.

Explanation: Here are some videos further explaining the cases!

Miranda vs. Arizona - https://youtu.be/FJ7ooBJ_DEU

Brown vs. Board of Education - https://youtu.be/4F4edxloXCc

Marbury vs. Madison - https://youtu.be/GLTCf1NMAj4

Plessy vs. Ferguson - https://youtu.be/vsDTqtyiNZk

comparison is that they aren't nationalistic. a dif is that sds is government approved movemnet while yaf isnt \

it isnt that hard

explanation:

the safahids used force when persuasion to convert from being a sunni muslim to embrace shi'ism was not effective. they also persecute shi'ites who have different views from their imposed teachings.