subject
History, 30.03.2021 05:40 Historyfinder

British colonies in New Zealand and Australia differed from British colonial holdings in India because they:
O A. produced valuable natural resources for Great Britain.
O B. broke away from British control almost immediately.
O C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.
O D. granted native populations equal political rights.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
Who was marshall mcluhan and what did he have to do with communication theory?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Did the spanish settlers and missions have a positive effect on world history? why, what did they do that was positive? why was the treaty of paris (1763) good for the world/world history? did the plymouth colony have a positive effect on world history? why, what did they do that was positive?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
What evidence is there in this document that the policy was a good idea?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
What issue led to the split in the democratic-republican party in the late 1850s
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
British colonies in New Zealand and Australia differed from British colonial holdings in India beca...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 17.01.2022 23:10
question
English, 17.01.2022 23:10
question
Chemistry, 17.01.2022 23:10
question
English, 17.01.2022 23:20
question
Social Studies, 17.01.2022 23:20
question
English, 17.01.2022 23:20
question
English, 17.01.2022 23:20
question
World Languages, 17.01.2022 23:20
Questions on the website: 13722367