Many american leaders pointed to Shay's Rebellion as proof that the Articles of Confederation were weak. Does this explanation for revising the Articles makes sense to you? Why or why not?

yes, the founding fathers wanted to make sure that rebellions would not be a common thing

Yes

Explanation:

If the articles of confederation were not revised, the government would become too weak and wouldn't have too much power.

lost > < > < > < > < > < > < > > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > > < > < > < > < > > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > < > > > > < > < > < > < > < > < > > < > < > < > < > > < > < > < > < > < > > < > < > < > < > > < > < __a__t__l__a_s_|

| |

||

the three roles stated in the dialogue develop the siblings' personalities.

lloyd's personality looks like a trademarketer

dana's personality is afraid from lloyd's behavior and the oldest sister is a decided person who tries to solve any conflict