subject
History, 18.03.2021 01:40 BigGirlsTheBest

How was Julius Caesar’s rule different from the rule of earlier Roman leaders? Select all that apply.

1. Caesar’s rule was meant to be permanent, whereas the rule of earlier Roman leaders was meant to be temporary.

2. Caesar’s rule was supported by other government members, whereas the rule of earlier Roman leaders was not supported by government members.

3. Caesar’s rule was viewed as a threat to democracy, whereas the rule of earlier Roman leaders was not seen as a threat.

4. Caesar’s rule was regarded negatively by the Roman people, whereas the rule of earlier Roman leaders was regarded more positively.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
Explain the strengths of the articles of confederation and how people reacted to this document. ! ^^^ 10 points
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:40
The superiors and subordinates of fbl inc., a swedish furniture manufacturing company, share a warm camaraderie. what kind of hofstede’s value dimension does this exhibit? a. a high power distance index b. a low power distance index c. a high uncertainty avoidance index d. a low uncertainty avoidance index
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Which of the choices below best describes columbus initial interaction with taino people
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:30
The united states' entry into world war ii had which of these effects on domestic politics? pro-union legislation was repealed. support for banking reform intensified. concerns about the economy were largely abandoned. attempts to promote civil rights became far more successful.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
How was Julius Caesar’s rule different from the rule of earlier Roman leaders? Select all that appl...
Questions
question
History, 30.09.2020 06:01
question
Mathematics, 30.09.2020 06:01
question
Mathematics, 30.09.2020 06:01
question
Mathematics, 30.09.2020 06:01
Questions on the website: 13722360