How did the Supreme Court rule in the Bush v. Gore decision in 2000? A. It ruled that there was not enough time to hold another recount.
B. It ruled that Al Gore had no grounds to challenge the recount
C. It ruled that George W. Bush had no grounds to challenge the recount.
D. It ruled that, despite being flawed, the recount was still valid.

Match your vocabulary word to its definition. 1. hectare reduced ability of the soil to support life 2. land degradation of spain and portugal 3. mangrove the pressing of soil particles closer together reducing the amount of air between particles 4. salinization 2.5 acres 5. junta group that controls the government 6. iberian small tropical tree 7. compaction higher than normal salt content in the soil