What idea was the decision in griswold v. connecticut based upon?
a. the case relied on testimony that incriminated the defendant.
b. the constitution should never be interpreted by the intention of the writers.
c. the constitution forbids unreasonable search and seizure.
d. individuals should be free to disobey laws involving infringement.

I believe the answer is: C. The Constitution forbids unreasonable search and seizure.

Griswold v. Connecticut initially revolve around the controversy regarding the law that prohibit the use of contraceptive in connecticut. In order to check whether a couple violate this law or not, the law enforcement need to come into the marital room in order to seek the contraceptive as soon as being used, which regarded as unreasonable search and seizure.

the answers are a b and d

biological/genetic factors means they were born or predisposed to have something. nothing can really change it, and you can't really do much to "fix" it. it isn't something learned

these are the biological factors:

adrian is relatively tall and he is on the basketball team

(adrian can't ever stop being tall or force himself to be tall. likely one or both of his parents are tall as well and they passed on the tall gene. he probably does basketball because he is tall)

the rest are environmental/cultural factors. these are things that are taught to us. for example, cynthia wasn't born saving pocket money, her family most likely taught her this (environmental factor)

hope this !