HELPP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF RIGHT Should the U. S. Senate have ratified (passed into law) the Treaty of New Echota?
Background: John Ross was the Principal Chief of the Cherokee Nation. He was the son of a Scottish Immigrant and a Cherokee mother. He wrote this letter to Congress in response to the New Echota Treaty being approved and before the Trail of Tears began.
“The treaty in question is not the act of our Nation; it has not received the sanction (approval) of our people. The makers of the treaty hold no office nor appointment in our Nation, [and have no] authority to assume the reins of Government, and to make bargain and sale of our rights, our possessions, and our common country. And we sadly declare, that the enforcement of the conditions of this treaty, against our consent, is an act of injustice and oppression …
And, therefore, we, the parties to be affected by the result, appeal with confidence to the justice, the magnanimity, the compassion, of your honorable bodies, against the enforcement, on us, this treaty,, in the formation of which we have had no say.”

Claim - The U. S. Senate should not have ratified the Treaty of New Echota.
Evidence

Cite evidence from the document that supports your claim
Reasoning

Explain how the evidence supports your claim

Learning Task 1: Fill out the table with the correct information. You may ask the

help of your guardian or you may

research from the internet for this activity. Write

your answers on your answer sheet.

Country

Location

Neighboring

countries

Description of Music

Japan

China

KoreaLearning Task 1: Fill out the table with the correct information. You may ask the

help of your guardian or you may

research from the internet for this activity. Write

your answers on your answer sheet.

Country

Location

Neighboring

countries

Description of Music

Japan

China

KoreaPLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIESTPLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

"The treaty in question is not the act of our Nation; it has not received the sanction (approval) of our people. The makers of the treaty hold no office nor appointment in our Nation, [and have no] authority to assume the reins of Government, and to make bargain and sale of our rights, our possessions, and our common country. And we sadly declare, that the enforcement of the conditions of this treaty, against our consent, is an act of injustice and oppression" John Ross explains that the Treaty doesn't have the approval of the people, how the treaty is flawed, and how it is ill-treatment of the people. It gives a clear description of the cons of ratifying the New Echota Treaty.

i believe its the indians

hi there!

question - in the 1900s there were two competing views about the environment that often pitted industrialist and conservationist against one another. how were these two competing views demonstrated by the environmental policies of president roosevelt and president taft?

hope this : )