subject
History, 26.02.2021 01:00 jpruitt10

In 1834, Dred Scott was a slave in the state of Missour, which was a slave state. His master took him into linois, a free state, and then to Wisconsin, a free teritory, and then back to Missouri. Scott was suing for his freedom based on what grounds ? A. This lawsuit was after the Emancipation Proclamation, and slavery was illegal. B. Based on popular sovereignty, Missouri was to become a free state the next year C. He had been a slave for 10 years; therefore, by law he should have been freed. D. He felit his residence in the free areas had made him a free man.​

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
How were chinese immigrants treated in the late 1800s
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:40
Identify whether each scenario describes a drawback of an advantage of trade regulation. benefits of trade regulations
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
Why did richard and mildred loving have to go to washington, d.c. to get married?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
Who was william jennings bryan? what platform did he run on?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In 1834, Dred Scott was a slave in the state of Missour, which was a slave state. His master took hi...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 19.08.2021 21:00
question
Mathematics, 19.08.2021 21:00
question
Social Studies, 19.08.2021 21:00
question
Physics, 19.08.2021 21:00
question
History, 19.08.2021 21:00
question
Mathematics, 19.08.2021 21:00
question
Spanish, 19.08.2021 21:00
question
History, 19.08.2021 21:00
Questions on the website: 13722361