There have been several controversial Supreme Court decisions in the past 50 years that many people believe should be overturned. Select one of the three cases listed below, and write a one-or
two-paragraph response explaining how the decision in that case could be overturned. In your response,
be sure to briefly describe the background of the case and which of the three ways - congressional
statute, constitutional amendment, or subsequent Supreme Court ruling - you believe would be the
most probable way the decision could be reversed. This section is worth 18 points.
Select one of these cases:
.
Kelo v. City of New London
Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency
.
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

after the french-indian war.

your answer to this question is true hope this

fairly positive it is 4

answer: the purpose of the "index of forbidden books" was to prevent the contamination of the faith or the corruption of morals of roman catholics according to canon law, through the reading of theologically mistaken or immoral books. the condemnation of published books, thus listed in the index librorum prohibitorum.

explanation: index librorum prohibitorum, (latin: “index of forbidden books”), list of books once forbidden by roman catholic church authority as dangerous to the faith or morals of roman catholics. publication of the list ceased in 1966, and it was relegated to the status of a historic document.

the 20th and final edition appeared in 1948, and the index was formally abolished on 14 june 1966 by pope paul vi. the aim of the list was to protect the faith and morals of the faithful by putting a stop to the reading of theologically, culturally, and politically disruptive books.