Why were absolute monarchies more common eastern europe than in western europe?

the church, which wanted to ban absolute monarchies, lost influence in eastern europe.

absolute monarchs in eastern european countries abolished the feudal system.

eastern european countries were less developed and relied on strong absolute monarchies.

absolute monarchs were wiser and more capable in eastern europe than western europe

The correct answer is A) the Church, which wanted to ban absolute monarchies, lost influence in Eastern Europe.

Absolute monarchies were more common in Eastern Europe than in Western Europe because the Church, which wanted to ban absolute monarchies, lost influence in Eastern Europe.

The term absolute monarchy refers to the political system in which the king is the absolute ruler of the reign, with no opposition at all to his will. Absolute monarchies gave the King total control of his kingdom and punished people who tried to express against the crown.

Absolute monarchies in Europe were the kingdom of Spain, the reign of France under Louis XIV, the tzars in Russia, Prussia, Sweden, and Denmark-Norway.

answer: this is because archeologists keep finding artefacts and ancient ruins dated more than 10000 to 15000 years, date around scientists said humans discovered language; which is at least mysterious as scientists always have said that is necessary to have a language to have architecture and some basic maths.

explanation: brainlest

from thales, who is often considered the first western philosopher, to the stoics and skeptics, ancient greek philosophy opened the doors to a particular way of thinking that provided the roots for the western intellectual tradition. here, there is often an explicit preference for the life of reason and rational thought. we find proto-scientific explanations of the natural world in the milesian thinkers, and we hear democritus posit atoms—indivisible and invisible units—as the basic stuff of all matter. with socrates comes a sustained inquiry into ethical matters—an orientation towards human living and the best life for human beings. with plato comes one of the most creative and flexible ways of doing philosophy, which some have since attempted to imitate by writing philosophical dialogues covering topics still of interest today in ethics, political thought, metaphysics, and epistemology. plato’s student, aristotle, was one of the most prolific of ancient authors. he wrote treatises on each of these topics, as well as on the investigation of the natural world, including the composition of animals. the hellenists—epicurus, the cynics, the stoics, and the skeptics—developed schools or movements devoted to distinct philosophical lifestyles, each with reason at its foundation.

with this preference for reason came a critique of traditional ways of living, believing, and thinking, which sometimes caused political trouble for the philosophers themselves. xenophanes directly challenged the traditional anthropomorphic depiction of the gods, and socrates was put to death for allegedly inventing new gods and not believing in the gods mandated by the city of athens. after the fall of alexander the great, and because of aristotle’s ties with alexander and his court, aristotle escaped the same fate as socrates by fleeing athens. epicurus, like xenophanes, claimed that the mass of people is impious, since the people conceive of the gods as little more than superhumans, even though human characteristics cannot appropriately be ascribed to the gods. in short, not only did ancient greek philosophy pave the way for the western intellectual tradition, including modern science, but it also shook cultural foundations in its own time.