World War I has begun. You are the leader of a European country and must decide what to do. Your
nation is one of several that have agreed to support each other in the event of war. Some of your allies
already have joined the fight. You oppose the thought of war and fear that joining will lead to even
more lives lost. Yet, you believe in being loyal to your allies. You also worry that your rivals want to
conquer all of Europe and if you don't join the war now, your country may end up having to defend
itself.
Should you always support a friend, no matter what he or she does? What might be the long-term
consequences of refusing to help an ally? In your opinion, what are reasons for going to war that might
justify the death and destruction that inevitably result? Essay

i believe the answer is:

-   william jennings bryan is a democrat while mckinley was a republican

at that time, the segment of population that choose for democratic party were the voters with low economic background and vice versa

- william jennings has support of populists and wants to have inflation to farmers while mckinley has support of bankers and businessmen , doesn't want inflation

the fixed value of gold make the large business able to stack up their gold without   being worried that it would devaluated.

- william jennings supported the silver standard while mckinley supported the gold standard

according to jenning, using other metal beside gold could the poor people to have more purchasing power and them advance in the society.

d) the constitution rights of native americans and their right to self-government on reservations