subject
History, 10.02.2021 02:00 andrespeerman

I think in both Vietnam and Korea we committed military forces without an intention to win, and indeed with a feeling that we could achieve some of our objectives simply by having some men there who would participate in limited kinds of activity, but in the case of Korea told not to win, and in the case of Vietnam clearly without the intention of applying the degree of force necessary to win. That's a very terrible thing to do to military people – to ask them to go into extreme danger, but in effect to have a decision made that it's not important enough for us to win. —Caspar Weinberger,
Secretary of defense in Reagan administration,
1987

What reason does Weinberger give for the United States losing the war?

The United States had never fought in a jungle setting before.
The United States’ troops were not strong enough to fight.
The United States entered the war without a real commitment to the conflict.
The United States should have followed the same approach as in the Korean War.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
How do you believe the japanese justified their imperialism in korea taiwan and china
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
What conclusion about the role of the media can be drawn from these headlines?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
Were the common crimes brought before the suffolk county court? what were the common sentences for convictions what? why type of punishment did the court prefer to inflict?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:50
Which is the best description of a political campaign tactic during the ele tion of 1828
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
I think in both Vietnam and Korea we committed military forces without an intention to win, and inde...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 20:30
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 20:30
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 20:30
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 20:30
Questions on the website: 13722361