In what way was James K. Polk's presidency not reflective of his statement, "The world has nothing to fear from military ambition in our Government."?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options for this question, we can say the following.

In what way was James K. Polk's presidency not reflective of his statement, "The world has nothing to fear from military ambition in our Government."?

In that his decisions and actions showed the imperialistic and expansionistic side of the United States federal government, supporting the idea of the Manifested destiny, believing that God blessed the United States to expand and grow.

That is why President Polk, for instance, negotiated with the British the Parallel 49 to settle the border dispute to Canada. He signed the Oregon Treaty on June 15, 1846.

Or the issues and differences with the Mexican government when President Polk offered the Mexican government $20,000,000 to acquire the territories of New Mexico and California.

the right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "their policy of "divide and rule" pitted political groups against each other to keep any one group from becoming too powerful.  " the  participant in european imperialism is being described below is that  their policy of "divide and rule" pitted political groups against each other to keep any one group from becoming too powerful.