New York and New Hampshire both claim land in Vermont territory which would bring in more settlers and money to their states. Neither is willing to compromise with the other over the land and there have been threats of war between the states. They ask the Confederate Congress to solve the problem. Can the government under the articles resolve this issue? Why or why not?

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

No, it could not.

Although the states of New Hampshire and New York ask the Confederate Congress to solve the problem, the central government under the Articles could not resolve this issue because, under the Articles of Confederation, the central government was weak and had little power to make decisions like this. Under the Articles of Confederation, it was the states the ones that were sovereign and could collect money through taxation. The central government -Congress- had to ask for money from the states in case Congress needed it. Congress had few unimportant powers such as to rule the operation of the post office.    

That is why many delegates met at the Constitutional Convention held in the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in the summer of 1787, to debate on the new form of a central government for the United States and the creation of a new Constitution.  

i think it is the byzantine empire

the caste system in india is the paradigmatic ethnographic example of caste. it has origins in ancient india, and was transformed by various ruling elites in medieval, early-modern, and modern india, especially the mughal empire and the british raj.it is today the basis of educational and job reservations in india.it consists of two different concepts, varna and jati, which may be regarded as different levels of analysis of this system.

the caste system as it exists today is thought to be the result of developments during the collapse of the mughal era and the british colonial regime in india. the collapse of the mughal era saw the rise of powerful men who associated themselves with kings, priests and ascetics, affirming the regal and martial form of the caste ideal, and it also reshaped many apparently casteless social groups into differentiated caste communities.the british raj furthered this development, making rigid caste organisation a central mechanism of administration

i didn’t fully understand your question but i hope this you !