Which argument sums up the difference between isolationists and interventionists regarding aid to the Allies? O A. Isolationists thought aid would bring us into war; interventionists thought aid would keep us out of the war.
B. Interventionists thought aid would bring us into war; isolationists thought aid would keep us out of the war.
O
C. Isolationists thought aid would help end the Depression; interventionists thought aid would prolong the Depression.
о
D. Interventionists thought aid would help end the Depression; isolationists thought aid would prolong the Depression.

ANSWER: Isolationists thought aid would bring us into war; interventionists thought aid would keep us out of the war. (A)

It allowed Germany to attack Poland with having to fight on two fronts.

Hope this helps :)

war never

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.