Whose approach to running an empire do you most appreciate: that of the Assyrians or the Persians? please put two answers for brainliest

I would say neither, both were equally cruel and not agreeable, but here goes nothing...

If your wanted answer is the Assyrians here you go :

I would appreciate the Assyrians for running an empire the most for their highly organized government for controlling captured lands can keep any conspirators from seizing the land back. And by cruelly capturing peoples, the enemy would know not to mess with ( us ) and we would build our empire further!

If your wanted answer is the Persians :

Their absolute monarchy can keep the king all in control. We can make request and no one could oppose if the king agrees. No coup can happen since it's an absolute monarchy and when the king sentences them to death, they die. We could grow our economy steadily with Persian empire running.

( Seriously it hard for me to write anything for the Persians... but yep )

the answer should be monarchy

a social contract.

"a social contract is an agreement between citizens and their leader where the citizens give up certain freedoms in exchange for protection. the constitution of the united states is an example of a social contract."