Briefly summarize the Outsider Test for Faith. Do you think it's fair (and realistic) to expect religious believers to apply this test? Why or why not? It was devised by an atheist. In your view, is it a compelling argument against belief?

assuming that by westerners you mean americans. that they were mean and controlling and abusive to its peasants.

explanation:

in his book, the riddle of the rosetta stone, james giblin talks about how there was a young british polymath and physician named thomas young who made a lot of advances on the deciphering of the rosetta stone. he says that even though young made a lot of mistakes because he was working under false assumptions, he also made huge contributions like deciphering three out of the seven symbols (more than anyone else before him). young published his findings and continued his good work but he wasn't able to progress much further due to some unfavorable situations, he still laid the basis for many other scholars and of course for the man who has been generally known to have deciphered it, jean-françois champollion

once he became head of state in 1915, venustiano (his name was not victoriano) carranza was able to implement some of his ideas, such as the drafting and the promulgation of the mexican constitution of 1917, which is still the current constitution of that country.  

where is the passage?