In Korematsu v. United States (1944), the Supreme Court ruled that when the nation is at war can be suspended. A.
freedom of the press
B.
the president’s executive privilege
C.
local elections
D.
some constitutional rights

D. some constitutional rights

Explanation:

Korematsu v. United States was the landmark case of 1944. After Japan attacked Perl Harbor, United States wanted to relocate all the people of Japanese ancestry, including citizens of the US, and put them to internment camps. Japanese-American Fred Korematsu refused to relocate, saying that the order breaks his right given by Fifth Amendment.

He was arrested and convinced, and the Supreme court affirmed his conviction. It was argued that some of the civil liberties and constitutional rights can be suspended and overruled in times of war.

1 > george s. boutwell

2 > general ulysses s. grant

3 > james a. garfeild

4 > adolph e. borie