In the 18th, 19th, and early 20th centuries, a wide variety of resistance movements across Asia and Africa fought against European imperialism. These movements reflected a range of organizational principles, from traditional kingdoms to religious movements to guerrilla nationalists. Develop an argument that compares at least two resistance movements in terms of their values, organization, and effectiveness at achieving their goals.

India's independence movement revolts in Sudan.

Explanation:

These two movements are opposed in all elements. The riots in Sudan were motivated by religion and carried out by violent methods. France had an administration in Sudan, and the organizers of the religion-sponsored movement sought to overthrow French rule. On the other hand, the old Indian independence movement was not on a violent path. Civil disobedience, peaceful protests were the main methods of resistance. India's independence movement is motivated by ethnicity and patriotism. So one movement used violent and militant methods, while the other movement used disobedience and patriotism.

they were byzantines

though both had similar roots, they both took these similar bases & formed it into their own way. both the byzantine empire and ancient roman have similar aspects, but each one made it unique. both the byzantine empire and ancient romans had roman influences which affected their culture