Which statement describes the Southern Colonies in relation to New England and the Middle Colonies? The Southern Colonies were settled after the Middle Colonies and New England, so they faced fewer hardships.

The coastal areas of the Southern Colonies were more like the rich fishing ground in New England than the coasts of the Middle Colonies.

The climate of the Southern Colonies was very similar to the Middle Colonies, but completely different from New England.

Slavery was allowed in the Southern Colonies, but was abolished above the Mason-Dixon line in the Middle Colonies and New England.

Slavery was allowed in the Southern Colonies, but was abolished above the Mason-Dixon line in the Middle Colonies and New England.

Explanation:

The Mason–Dixon line, which was originally surveyed to serve as a boundary dispute resolution between Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Delaware (present day middle states and new England ) around the 1760s. This line later became the dividing line between the free states in the North and the slave states in the South.

Hence, in this case, the correct answer is " Slavery was allowed in the Southern Colonies, but was abolished above the Mason-Dixon line in the Middle Colonies and New England."

the two things that develop a strong social foundation are: a. separation of church and states e. education received attention separation of church and states separate the illogical  argument that came from religious beliefs to a fact based belief. while education will make us remember the past to avoid the repeat of our mistakes.

congress seems to have some powers the states do not have. they can do some pretty big things, they can declare war. and they can lead armies and navies. they also have the power to create a mail delivery system, make foreign treaties, print and borrow money, (both states and congress can do that)and make rules for certain places, i think they said the western states.  

the new government has been a big to growing their country! they are getting new land over west. and they are passing laws which to settle boundary issues.  

although most of this information sounds good for them, bad for us, there are some weaknesses from their plan. the people are still having issues with taxes and trading goods, they also don't have a main leader such as a chief or a president. they also have trouble with currency. the states are printing out so much money the national currency is beginning to be worthless. so things are getting hard to handle over here.  

some of the americans like the new government and think that even if they could ask about changing it they would be ignored. daniel shays got a group of people who hated the new government and decided to attack. this could become either worse or better.

(one-paragraph analysis)  

i think that they may start a war or some sort of big attack to make them change their government. most americans just don't want to discuss it. but i think that daniel man will speak up for them. if they do scare them they will get a better government and be able to deal with their issues better! i think that is what is going to happen next in the u.s., sincerely

lorelei     hope this i had some from the internet u   can report me if u want