All primary sources have their limitations and historians need to corroborate this piece of evidence with other pieces of evidence to have a clearer understanding of time period. What is a corroborating piece of evidence that would help a historian to better understand Paul’s life? Why?

Opposition to the nra came to a head in 1935, when the conservative supreme court declared the agency unconstitutional, claiming the nra gave the executive branch regulatory powers that belonged exclusively to congress. this decision began a series of court decisions that overturned key elements of the new deal.