FREE POINTS this is a challenge to see who can be rude and meaner, the winner gets brainliest, so let your anger out and throw it at me.

I am not going to be mean but I’ll take the free points ;)

Explanation:

Thank you very much!

Dum Dum you aren't supposed to be using the site for this so if you don't get your rubber ducky flat chess no nipple cress off this site.

Explanation:

There!

food chain i would say only because there is competition on getting food and survival

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.