How the interior of a church has changed from the beginning of the 16th century to the reign of Edward VI

The appearance of the church during Edward VI became much more modest.

Explanation:

The king was raised as a Protestant and sought to implement reformist ideas in England. To this end, he fundamentally changed the state church headed by the English king. These changes were also involved in the interior of the church itself. Churches before the reform had a lavish and rich interior. The king decided to change that. Since the original Catholicism dictates simplicity and shame, the king changed the church's appearance in the country accordingly. He decided to throw out the gorgeous paintings that adorned the interior. The king also threw out expensive furniture and put in another that was much simpler.

where is the cartoon dude

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is