PLEASE HELP ME, first one to answer and to get it right gets The right of accused people to not be forced by government to give evidence against themselves exists in the

Fifth Amendment and was addressed by Miranda v. Arizona
Sixth Amendment and was addressed by Miranda v. Arizona
Fifth Amendment and was addressed by in re Gault
Sixth Amendment and was addressed by in re Gault

The answer to your question is A.

Explanation:

Fifth Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Hope this helps! <3

the answer is false.

comparison is that they aren't nationalistic. a dif is that sds is government approved movemnet while yaf isnt \

it isnt that hard

explanation: