If you are a lawyer presenting a case to an appellate court, which of the following questions would you expect the judges to ask during oral arguments? (Select all that apply.) Why do you believe the lower court made an error in the decision? What are the legal principles of the original case that led to the lower court’s decision? Why do you believe the lower court’s error was harmful enough to make a difference? What are the facts of the original case that led to the lower court’s decision?

You would expect them to ask oral arguments such as the place, the location, and the suspect in question. We should accept that the lower court made an error if there is a lawyer president with evidence. The lower court could be harmful if they have reached a decision. The facts of the original case can lead to the court's final jurisdiction.

Explanation:

answer

explanation

the given equation is

we can rewrite this as:

let

then the equation becomes:

the factors of 8 that sum up to -9 are {-1,-8}

we split the middle term with these factors to obtain,

we factor by grouping to obtain:

apply the zero product property to get:

but

one central belief of buddhism is often referred to as reincarnation -- the concept that people are reborn after dying. buddhism is a philosophy of life expounded by gautama buddha ("buddha" means "enlightened one"), who lived and taught in northern india in the 6th century b.c.