In the space provided, make an argument for or against the policy of judicial review. Should the Supreme Court have the ability to deem laws and executive actions unconstitutional? Why or why not! PLS NEED HELP!!!

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

My argument is to support the policy of judicial review.  I think the US Supreme Court has the ability to deem laws and executive actions unconstitutional because the US government has to have a neutral branch that can decide on difficult issues without any favoritism or bias.

The United States Congress has members of the two national parties: the Republican Party and the Democratic Party. Both political parties could have particular agendas or personal interests that can bias the nature of law and could distort a piece of legislation.

That is why it is so important that the judicial branch -the Supreme Court-  can have the independence granted in the US constitution to freely decide when a law is unconstitutional.

during the ming dynasty

its main object was the establishment of "settlement houses" in poor urban areas, in which volunteer middle-class "settlement workers" would live, hoping to share knowledge and culture with, and alleviate the poverty of, their low-income neighbors.