The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people a- under arrest as juveniles have many of the same rights as adults
b- accused of crimes have the right to a second trial upon request
c- who cannot afford an attorney must be provided one by the state
d- that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement

d- that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement

Explanation:

The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement.

This was as a result of an arrest made by law enforcement officials who failed to read the Miranda rights to a suspect which was later challenged in court as inadmissible as evidence.

the french revolution main idea was to give power to the people. the revolution was influenced by the enlightenment ideas, reasoning and skepticism pushed people to revolt against standards and norms in french society.

the problem was that the revolution caused political turmoil, and napoleon saw this as an opportunity and launched a coup d’état in november 1799. he became the first consul of france and later named french emperor.

some people see napoleon as a hero of the revolution and others see him as a traitor.

people see him as a traitor because he noticed the political turmoil and used this moment to rise to power. others see him as a hero of the revolution because he had some political and military achievements - in which he was committed to promoting the achievements of the french revolution - he had extensive public constructions, made a civil reform.

in a bigger picture, napoleon had some huge achievements in france which made him very important, but the fact that he seized power to himself makes him an undeniable traitor to the revolution since the main idea of it was to remove people from power and give power to the people.

really and truely i dont know sorry