A democratic society in which citizens do not fulfill their responsibility to vote in state, local, and national elections, would be a society unable to do which of the following selections?

Explanation:

could you provides the selections please?

You didn’t put any options but...

Explanation:

If you did, I would say that this is no longer a democratic society. If you can’t vote, it’s either a dictatorship or anarchy. BUT if you needed an answer I would say that it couldn’t...

1) elect a president

2) Make fair laws

The reason for society is that citizens get safety and security and leaders get the power to make laws in which citizens follow, creating a fair balance. Now, in a society where fair laws can not be put in place, how can leaders keep citizens safe and secure? How can they hold up their end of the bargain? They can’t. This isn’t even a society.

most of the knowledge we have of the conflict comes from roman-jewish scholar titus flavius josephus, who first fought in the revolt against the romans, but was then kept by future emperor vespasian as a slave and interpreter.

hello there!

the graphics that you have attached within the question, indicates that few people in bolivia work in industry according to its labor force.

however, the graphic that is on the right side of the picture shows the gdp sector in bolivia. this gross domestic product is a macroeconomic magnitude   that shows the monetary value of all finished goods and services within a country's borders in a specific time period. in this case, the graphic is showing the monetary value in each sector -agriculture, industry and services- of bolivia in 2012.

so, although the first graphic located at the left side indicates that not so many people work in industry, this is the second most important sector according to the gdp metrics because of the monetary value that impacts on its country. it does not need to be the most valuable one. if it makes an impact on the country's economy, it will be definitely crucial to it.