Can someone write me a context of the scientific revolution of the Middle Ages?

The "Scientific Revolution" by tradition refers to historical shifts in thought and belief, to changes in social and institutional organization that took place in Europe between about 1550-1700, beginning with Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543), who proclaimed a heliocentric (sun-centered) cosmos, ending with Isaac Newton (1642-1727), who proposed universal laws and a Mechanical Universe.

Better still, what do historians mean when they talk about the 'Science Revolution'? What follows is a cautious attempt to explain basic problems and propose less apparent ones for others. The following narrative offers examples as an introduction to the idea of the Scientific Revolution that render the tale more complex, arguably, which might seem to contradict the very notion of a Scientific Revolution. In any event, this brief essay should be seen as only one example of how historians produce more.

The Scientific Revolution, in other words, offers an outstanding exercise in thinking about how historical periodizations arise, evolve, and mature. Periodizations, arguably, act as paradigms for both learners and academics. They act as a forum for discussion as well. Good periodizations promote discussion, and the best of them are becoming more problematic, encouraging ever more concentrated research and more creative and fulfilling interpretations of past events.

These kinds of problems are faced by all history students. Whether it be the Revival, Reformation, Scientific Revolution, and Enlightenment, or the Colonial Era, Civil War, Gilded Age,' Sixties' or Harlem Renaissance, they are still present in every historical periodization.

Explanation:

Hope This Helps!!! : )

i believe the correct answer is option b. most eastern european nations joined nato.

though i could be wrong, option d. the eastern european nations were granted complete independence, would be another choice.

hope this ! : )