subject
History, 17.12.2020 01:00 bella122805

HEL I WILL GIVE FREE BONUS POINTS IF I PASS THIS (NO PLAGERISM)

Historical “revisionism” is the practice of revising the generally accepted version of a history. Rather than assuming that history books and previous historians are “telling the whole truth” about history, revisionists reexamine the evidence left by history and may assign new and different meaning or significance to historical events.

Reasonable people disagree about whether historical revisionism is a valid and beneficial practice. What do you think? Should people accept the version of history that they’ve been taught, or should they look for other ways to interpret, view, or describe historical events?
Explain your answer in a thoughtful discussion post, including your reasons for thinking as you do about revisionism.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
Brainliesttt asap!me : ) answer in your own words. what was the relationship between medieval theories about scientific reasoning and the kind of reasoning favored during the scientific revolution?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
Which of the following statements best describes the importance of the battle of
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
Who coined the phrase “go west and grow with the country”?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:30
Which of the following groups were allies against the pequot indians during the pequot war?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
HEL I WILL GIVE FREE BONUS POINTS IF I PASS THIS (NO PLAGERISM)

Historical “revisionism...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 08.01.2021 23:10
question
Mathematics, 08.01.2021 23:10
question
Mathematics, 08.01.2021 23:10
question
Mathematics, 08.01.2021 23:10
question
Mathematics, 08.01.2021 23:10
Questions on the website: 13722360