Why do some people consider the way the media cover candidates for public office bad for democracy? A. People tend to vote for the candidates who they find most appealing, rather than the ones whose beliefs are most like their own.

B. The media are for-profit businesses, unable to be fair or objective in the interest of the public.

C. Candidates already in office receive more media attention than those who are trying to take their positions.

D. People always vote for the person the media determine is most qualified, rather than the candidate who can bring about change.

B

Explanation:

Since a very large portion of media companies are for profit, they cannot be relied upon to bring unbiased and fair coverage, since the company wanting to make money will go to wherever the most money is. Media personalities attempt to get you into their shows to make advertising revenue. However to do this sometimes they have to be unfair to have people interested in their shows.

B. The media are for-profit businesses, unable to be fair or objective in the interest of the public.

Explanation:

Some people consider the way the media cover candidates for public office bad for democracy because The media are for-profit businesses,

where is the section with the question?

the main reason the us senate rejected the treaty of versailles was because "european nations wanted to punish germany"

d(:

me and mark as brainliest.