What are some objections critics have raised in response to global agreements and organizations? Check all that apply. International treaties can limit the influence of the United States. NAFTA has resulted in a loss of jobs for many American workers. The Kyoto Protocol did not do enough to protect the environment. The United Nations is often ineffective at solving global problems. The World Bank does not provide loans to countries that need them. Rules set by the World Trade Organization benefit only big corporations.

with the political divide on multiple issues we are headed that way but one of the biggest issues that has texas involved is that democrats believe that only and form of officer or military member can posses a firearm and if they ever end up repealing the right to bear arms i am sure that most people in the lower southern states would choose to seceed in order to keep thier firearms and even fight for them. this is my opinion it does in no way, shape, form, or fashion represent everyone in the lower southern states nor am i implying thst only the southern states want to keep there firearms.

the democratic party is the answer because they disapproved of slavery

since our new president elect donald trump is about to come into office, and since he is stating diferent signs about enforcing immigration laws, he has persuaded people into beliving that immigrants are the reason for crime & terrorism (of course thats only an example, there are many more reasons why but you probably get my idea).

read more on -

the answer is physical        

explanation: