What did you include in your response? Check all that apply. After the drought, the remaining environment was mostly brown. Having brown coloration was a favorable adaptation because it allowed the frogs to blend in with the surrounding environment. The brown frogs were the ones that survived and reproduced, causing the number of brown frogs to increase. Having green coloration was an unfavorable adaptation because the frogs were unable to blend in with the surrounding environment. The green frogs were less likely to survive and reproduce, causing the number of green frogs to decrease.

After the drought, the remaining environment was mostly brown. Having brown coloration was a favorable adaptation because it allowed the frogs to blend in with the surrounding environment. The brown frogs were the ones that survived and reproduced, causing the number of brown frogs to increase. Having green coloration was an unfavorable adaptation because the frogs were unable to blend in with the surrounding environment. The green frogs were less likely to survive and reproduce, causing the number of green frogs to decrease

Explanation:

Green frogs strife during the rainy season as they can easily blend in with the vegetation to evade predators, feed and reproduce. But during drought, the vegetation dies off leaving the green frogs exposed to predators which in turn reduces mobility and reproduction, causing the green frog population to decline.

On the other hand, the brown frogs are unaffected by the drought as their camouflage makes them invisible to predators, giving them the chance to feed and reproduce.

the vast majority of ballots have been counted nearly two weeks after one of the biggest political upsets in modern u.s. history catapulted donald trump to the presidency.

estimates show more than 58 percent of eligible voters went to the polls during the 2016 election, nearly breaking even with the turnout rate set during the last presidential election in 2012, even as the final tallies in states like california continue to be calculated, according to statistics collected by the u.s. elections project.

but among those figures were stark contrasts in key states that swing the election to trump — in ohio, wisconsin, iowa, michigan and elsewhere — indicating the president-elect’s leap from long-shot candidate to the most powerful political position in the world may have happened in part because of apathy toward hillary clinton’s candidacy, especially among the democratic base, several political scientists and organizations monitoring voter turnout told the pbs newshour.

while clinton is leading the popular vote by more than 1.5 million over trump as of sunday, she trails president obama’s 2012 totals by more than 2 million ballots — a chasm that may have cost her the election, said david becker, co-founder of the center for election and innovation and research.

“several million voters didn’t come out to vote,” becker said. “which is telling me that this idea of the trump wave, a huge number of voters shifting over to trump, is certainly not the story.”