The Philadelphia City Council decided to bar skateboarders from Love Park. Some of the council's actions are listed below in chronological order. Q: Which answer correctly matches policy cycle steps with the events?

1. The city council worried that skateboarding was damaging Love Park and discouraging development in the center of the city.

2. City council members proposed a total ban on skateboarding. Using private funding, skateboarders proposed to support skateboarding in city parks.

3. City officials resolved to enforce the ordinance banning skateboarding in all public parks.

4. Love Park was rebuilt to make it a less attractive place to go skateboarding.

Options:

A. Policy adoption, Policy Implementation, Policy Evaluation, Policy Formulation

B. Agenda Setting, Policy Formulation, Policy Implementation, Policy Evaluation

C. Policy Formulation, Agenda Setting, Policy Evaluation, Policy Implementation

D. Agenda Setting, Policy Formulation, Policy Adoption, Policy Implementation

The answer that correctly matches policy cycle steps with the events is:

D. Agenda Setting, Policy Formulation, Policy Adoption, Policy Implementation.

This above is correct because when we look at the policy cycle, we discover that:

Policy cycle is known to be a way/process in which an issue is developed from initial ideas to its evaluation.

Thus, Option D is the correct answer.

Learn more about policy cycle on link

D. Agenda Setting, Policy Formulation, Policy Adoption, Policy Implementation

Explanation:

The correct order is the one above.

At first, the city council of Philadelphia set the agenda, bringing forward the issue of skateboarding and Love park to the discussion table.

Then, the city council formulated a policy: the total ban of skateboarding.

This policy was adopted by the council, by issuing an ordinance for this purpose.

Finally, the policy was actually implemented: the park was made less attractive for skateboarders.

you really need to put more information in your (question); /// i believe you are talking about ///creek traveler"s rest, about lewis and clark not good

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.