Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide

a) the sights and sounds of an event.
b) insights into the thoughts and feelings of participants in an event.
c) a more thorough analysis of the impact on history of an event.
d) an evaluation of opinions of people at an event.

The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the third choice or letter C. Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide a more thorough analysis of the impact on history of an event.

A secondary source is any source about an event, period, or issue in history that was produced after that event, period or issue has passed. Aside from a textbook, the most commonly assigned secondary source is a scholarly monograph - a volume on a specific subject in the past, written by an expert.

I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in

Here Secondary sources would be valuable to a historian in order to provide .

. ... A) the sights and sounds of an event. B) insights into the thoughts and feelings of participants in an event. C) a more thorough analysis of the impact on history of an event. D) an evaluation of opinions of people at an event. 0.

C4 i’m pretty sure