PLEASE HELP I’LL GIVE BRAINLIST if another nation attacked the United States without provocation (a reason or a
first attack by the US) do you think the US should declare war? Would you
serve in the military in that case? Why or why not?

No, the United States should not declare war.

Explanation:

If there was no reason to attack the U.S, then there is no reason to fight back. We shouldn't waste precious materials and money on something that could disappear just as soon as it started. If, and only if, they persist then we do have the right to defend ourselves. But the U.S should try to find the reason that they wanted to attack us for. There is no action without a reason. Then we could come to a conclusion on the subject.

This is only my opinion, so please don't think that your answer, or thinking should have to change.

by 1890, the united states had by far the world's most productive economy. american industry produced twice as much as its closest competitor--britain. but the united states was not a great military or diplomatic power. its army numbered less than 30,000 troops, and its navy had only about 10,000 seamen. britain's army was five times the size of its american counterpart, and its navy was ten times bigger. the united states' military was small because the country was situated between two large oceans and was surrounded by weak or friendly nations. it faced no serious military threats and had little interest in asserting military power overseas.

the correct answer is: the fact that the anti-federalist papers were considered poorly written.