subject
History, 07.12.2020 08:40 deaishaajennings123

This statement explains the rationale used to justify the Supreme Court's reversal of which long-standing legal
doctrine?
1. the clear and present danger doctrine
2. the Manifest Destiny doctrine
3. the separate but equal doctrine
4. de facto segregation doctrine

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
What does the term “escalation” refer to?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:20
What did this mean for dred scott? a.scott was not a citizen of the united states. b.scott was the property of the federal government. c.scott had no right to sue for his freedom in court. d.scott was considered the property of the slaveholding family.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Complete this history worksheet . answer as many questions as you can.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:00
Instead of being thirteen republics, under a federal head, [the federalists’ plan] is clearly designed to make us one [unified] government. . whether such a change can ever be [made] in any manner; whether it can be [made] without convulsions and civil wars; whether such a change will not totally destroy the liberties of this country—time only can determine. –the federal farmer what best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses? in time, one unified government will run the country. the federalists prefer thirteen republics to one unified government. one unified government probably will not lead to disruptions and civil wars. under one unified government, people will be robbed of their freedoms.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
This statement explains the rationale used to justify the Supreme Court's reversal of which long-st...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 29.06.2019 04:30
Questions on the website: 13722361