How do the achievements of the Mayans compare to that of the Greeks or Romans? Were the Mayans more advanced? About the Same? Or perhaps not
as advanced as these two European civilization.
Help I need to write a paragraph on this

The Mayans were at about the same level of development as the Greeks and Romans.

Explanation:

The Romans and Greeks are the most famous of the European civilizations of antiquity, and the reason for that is that they were more advanced than the rest of the European civilizations, at least in the majority of things. On the other side of the world, in Mesoamerica, the Maya existed much earlier than the Greeks and Romans, in the same period as these two, and outlived them. They have developed a civilization that was more advanced than the surrounding civilizations, and it was actually on about the same level of development as the Greeks and Romans.

If we take the accomplishments of the Maya on one side and the Greeks and Romans on another side, we will see that in most things they have about the same level of development, the Maya being more advanced in some aspects, while the Greeks and Romans in others, so they balance each other out. While at their peaks these civilizations seem to have reached about the same heights, it has to be mentioned that the Maya had a big portion of their achievements in a period where the Greeks and Romans were not existing as such, thus they developed certain things centuries and even millenniums earlier than their European counterparts.

(Hope this helped you! and may i have brainlest? okay goodbye hop you have a blessed day!)

c. the dred scott v. sandford case,

atman means 'eternal self'. the atman refers to the real self beyond ego or false self. it is often referred to as 'spirit' or 'soul' and indicates our true self or essence which underlies our existence.

there are many interesting perspectives on the self in hinduism ranging from the self as eternal servant of god to the self as being identified with god. the understanding of the self as eternal supports the idea of reincarnation in that the same eternal being can inhabit temporary bodies.

the idea of atman entails the idea of the self as a spiritual rather than material being and thus there is a strong dimension of hinduism which emphasises detachment from the material world and promotes practices such as asceticism. thus it could be said that in this world, a spiritual being, the atman, has a human experience rather than a human being having a spiritual experience.

explanation: