Why were the states leery about having only one group of leaders? A. the states did not have enough money? B. The states had just broken away from tyrannical British rule C. the states did not want to give up personal control.

the lowest among the social higher rank were the working class. this class remained detached to the political progression   of the country and was hostile to the other two classes

this question makes no sense dude

the graphs indicate that few people in bolivia work in industry, as that is the least expressive sector shown in the respective graphic.

the answer is c. hope is