Why were some European political leaders, such as Kings and Dukes, attracted to Luther’s movement? How could supporting Luther benefit them?

The Protestant Reformation, led by the monk Martin Luther, was a movement that took place in Europe in the 16th century, whose objectives were religious and political.

Luther wrote a document of 95 tests that criticized the Catholic Church and the Pope, such as condemning usury, condemning clerical celibacy and condemning the sale of indulgences.

The movement was supported by European political leaders such as Kings and Dukes, as the Church had an important role in the spiritual and administrative domain of the kingdoms, which was a reason for dispute with the State.

Luther therefore enlisted the support of political leaders as a way of guaranteeing what he said was the "divine right of kings", the right to obtain ideological power and the collection of taxes that had previously belonged to the Church.

Learn more here:

link

Because getting rid of one universal and powerful Christian Church increased their power and wealth. They wouldn't have the Church limiting their power anymore or have to pay taxes to it. Also as the Church was a big supporter of the king it would increase their power against the king.

So, it was all political...more power, more money, more independence from king or Church. The papacy...completely usurped every royal household snd parliament it could should they decide something for their country and subjects that went against its teachings.

 The church interfered in all aspects of nation states affairs,taxes,wedfings,religious …everything and they grew tired of its meddling and took to luthers ideas.

Explanation:

separate but equal was a legal doctrine in united states constitutional law according to which racial segregation did not violate the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution, which guaranteed "equal protection" under the law to all people. under the doctrine, as long as the facilities provided to each race were equal, state and local governments could require that services, facilities, public accommodations, housing, medical care, education, employment, and transportation be segregated by race, which was already the case throughout the states of the former confederacy. the phrase was derived from a louisiana law of 1890, although the law actually used the phrase "equal but separate

hope this : d

slavery, abortion, donald trump, gay marriage, racial rights, immigration  

explanation:

anything that has been broth up to the supreme court is something of grate political divide   so just look as court cases