How did the case Miranda v. Arizona change the interpretation of the Fifth Amendment? It allows people to waive their right to Fifth Amendment protection.
It extended the protection to legal actions outside the courtroom.
It ensured that suspects always have an attorney if they want one.
It requires that law enforcement officers read a person his or her rights when they are arrested.

It requires that law enforcement officers read a person his or her rights when they are arrested.

Explanation:

The Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case brought to limelight the laxity of policemen in reminding arrested suspects of their rights of self incriminating as failure to inform them would render any confession made invalid in court. Miranda was not informed of his Constitutional rights before interrogation by the police.

The case Miranda v. Arizona change the interpretation of the Fifth Amendment because it requires that law enforcement officers read a person his or her rights when they are arrested.

one of the major compromises in the constitutional convention was between the small states and big states. the small states wanted each state to have the same number of representatives in congress. the big states wanted representation based on population.

a.) a poor farmer, due to the fact that they would want to be freed from british rule.