Why did the colonists grow to dislike the British after the French and Indian War? Give 2 examples of grievances(taxes or acts) the colonists had with the British. Be sure to explain each grievance in detail. Be sure to include an opening and closing sentence. Minimum of 8 sentences.

The American colonists (not really known as such then) grew further and further apart after the French and Indian war due to the constant pushing of the British. From things to heavy taxation, to the restriction of land that they fought for, the colonists were angry at the British. An example of a disturbance of the two is the Sugar Act, which is also called the Plantation Act or Revenue Act. British legislation aimed at ending the smuggling trade in sugar and molasses from the French and Dutch West Indies and tried providing increased revenues to fund enlarged British Empire dept. holds following the French and Indian War. Another point of time that made the colonists resent and hate the British was the Tea Act of 1773. The Tea Act was an Act of the British Parliament. The main goal was to reduce the massive amount of tea product held by the financially hurting British East India Company in its London warehouses, and to help the struggling company in total. Acts like these (which reoccurred over, and over again) began to break apart the colonists and Great Britain's relationship.

(Don't include this!) I hope this will get the job done!

answer:   migrations were important in the neolithic period. "two major migrations passing through southeastern europe were confirmed by the means of archaeo-genetic studies."

the first migration was the early neolithic period -- 6,000 before common era (bce) -- when the first farmers, from anatolia -- asia minor -- spread through europe. the second migration occurred during the early bronze age (3,000-2,500 bce) when the so-called "steppe population," from the eurasian steppe, replaced much of northern europe's previous population.

the first farmers of northern and western europe passed through southeastern europe with limited hunter-gatherer genetic admixture, which occurs when two or more previously isolated populations begin interbreeding. however, some groups that remained mixed extensively -- without the male-biased, hunter-gatherer admixture that prevailed later in the north and west, according to latest discoveries. southeastern europe continued to be a nexus between east and west, with intermittent genetic contact with the steppe people up to 2,000 years before the migrations that replaced much of northern europe's population.

"in some places, hunter-gatherers and incoming farmers seem to have mixed very quickly," says iain mathieson, a geneticist at the university of pennsylvania, who was first author of the paper. "but, mostly, the two groups remained isolated, at least for the first few hundred years. these hunter-gatherers had been living there for thousands of years, and it must have been quite a shock to have these new people show up -- with a completely different lifestyle and appearance."

discrimination! they faced a lot of racism