History, 02.12.2020 17:00 jtgarner402

Imagine you are living in England during the 1600s, just before it changed from a limited monarchy to an absolute monarchy. Write a letter to the king stating your views in opposition to the change to an absolute monarchy l. Give your reasons for opposing the change. Be specific and give examples. Be sure too tell who you are what status you may have

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: owensdonld

In this fictitious scenario, my name is Henry Decass, a nobleman, childhood friend of the king.

Explanation:

Your royal highness.

After receiving the news about the changes in the format of the monarchy that will change from a limited monarchy to an absolute monarchy, I reflected a lot on the matter and with concern I humbly decided to write to you, asking you to reconsider this change.

In my humble opinion, I see absolute monarchy as a very complicated and tiring system. It is not correct that you, as king, have the full power of our territory. This is because, although you recognize you as a genius, you cannot take all the burden of a country for yourself, as it would spend much of its energy and rationality. It is necessary that the power of the kingdom be divided and that although you are the great master and responsible for everything, it is preferable that there are men of trust who can help you manage this power, the kingdom that is very extensive and that has chances of becoming extend further.

As I said earlier, I recognize that your majesty is great, but unfortunately, you are not omnipresent and cannot command everything, absolutely alone, because in addition to bringing management risks to the kingdom, I believe it will bring risks to your health.

I apologize if it was inconvenient, because as you well know I have always honored our friendship and complicity above all and I have faith that you will listen to my advice with kindness.

From your eternal servant,

Henry Decas.

Answer from: Quest

according to the quotation from booker t. washington's 1895 atlanta compromise speech.

in the great leap from slavery to freedom . . the masses of us are to live by the production of our hands . . we shall prosper . . as we learn to dignify and glorify common labor.

washington believed that hard work had its own kind of dignity.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

Answer from: Quest

one company controls all the means of production of a product.

~coco

Another question on History

History, 20.06.2019 18:04

This cartoon references the supreme court case from 1896 which made segregation of the races legal. what was the name of this case

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 13:00

Which statement accurately describes a difference between the declarationof independence and the u.s. constitution? a. the u.s. constitution established rules for the u.s. government,while the declaration of independence did not.b. the u.s. constitution listed the colonists' reasons for rebellingagainst great britain, while the declaration of independence didnot.c. the u.s. constitution is based on ideals from the enlightenment,while the declaration of independence is not.0d. the u.s. constitution created a very weak central government,while the declaration of independence created a strong one.

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 09:00

What affects did the great depression have on americans

Answers: 3

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 11:00

The plantation economy in the south produced a. equal opportunity for all whites and no illiteracy. b. low profits despite the enslavement of a great number of people. c. great profits and developed great educational institutions. d. great profits at the expense of cultural development and equal opportunity.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Imagine you are living in England during the 1600s, just before it changed from a limited monarchy t...

Questions