Which explains how the actions of Bernardo de Gálvez affected British troops in Florida? By opening a second front at Mobile, de Gálvez prevented the British from sending additional troops to Pensacola.
O By opening a second front at Pensacola, de Gálvez prevented the British from sending additional troops north.
By opening a second front at Mobile, de Gálvez prevented the British from sending additional troops to East Florida
By opening a second front at Pensacola, de Gálvez prevented the British from sending additional troops to Mobile.

Which statement best describes the precedent set by the supreme court in new york times v. united states regarding government censorship? government censorship is fine if there is a good reason. government censorship is almost always unconstitutional. government censorship must further national interests. government censorship does not apply to opinions.

Which statement best describes the response by the united states and its allies to the berlin blockade? planes dropped tons of supplies around the city each day. trucks smuggled tons of supplies into berlin about once a week. tons of supplies were delivered to west berlin by boats. tons of supplies were purchased from east berlin each day.

The proposed downtown mall development will cause severe economic harm to our city. i, like everyone else here, am concerned about the troubled economy, and we all know the importance of job creation — especially here - but these concerns shouldn't push us to blindly support supposed "job creators" without first looking at the data. the truth is that when jobs are created in one place, they're usually destroyed somewhere else. studies have shown that for every job created by a mall, at least one job in a local business is lost. as the former owner of two long-standing small businesses in our community, i know all too well the power of these big commercial chains. my fellow citizens, we have watched this evil evolve for decades, and it's time to take a stand. these new chain stores may be able to offer lower prices on some goods, but they also take money out of our community to pay distant executives and shareholders. if we oppose what is the author's point of view?