Please help!! In your opinion, were the citizens of France justified in using armed force against their king during the French Revolution? Why or why not?

Revolution is not possible without violence.

Explanation:

Revolution and violence are coherent terms. Almost no revolution in history (at least one that represents a change in the political sense) has passed without violence. The French Revolution, as such, is one of the most famous in history. The people demanded changes of government in the country at all costs. These attitudes also implied violence. Violence was an integral part of the French Revolution, and the people showed it in practice. The French resolution is otherwise characterized by a high degree of violence.

the answer is they believed george iii would never give them their freedom.

b) new machinery hope i